Hey Brainy,
That web link ought to be just fine. Be sure to select the 220K value, not the default 200K. The 0.6w rating is higher than you need here, but since the resistor is the same size as a 1/4w, there's no problem there. Chances are very good you'll never need anything bigger than a 1/4W rating for pedal building. That doesn't mean you can't use a bigger value, but why spend more money? Plus components increase in size along with the wattage/voltage ratings, and we like to stay small.
The important difference between metal film and carbon film resistors is manufacturing tolerance. The brown carbon film ones, like DVM pictured above, are typically accurate to within 5% of their stated value. Metal film resistors, usually blue, are typically accurate to within 1% (or sometimes 2%) of their stated value. It has been my experience that when values are off-spec (which they nearly always are), the resistance is usually lower than the stated value, and almost never higher.
Metal film also is said to introduce less noise into audio circuits, while carbon film resistors are sometimes said to be "hissy". I've never noticed a difference, really. You may also see carbon comp resistors from time to time, usually in builds advertised as having lots of "mojo".
These are the old-school resistors that look like a big brown tube. They are often only accurate to 20% of their stated tolerance! In fact, most carbon comps will be a
minimum of 10% off -- because resistors with tolerances better than 10% were kept aside and sold at a higher price by some of the major manufacturers.
Lastly, I think the color codes on carbon film resistors are easier to read, because the last band is a metallic paint that signifies tolerance. In the case of the one pictured above, it's a gold band to denote 5%. On metal film resistors, it's often assumed that you know the tolerance is 1%, so the color bands are printed without it. This can lead to reading the codes backwards - another reason it's good to measure your components with a DMM before installing them.
That's probably more info than you wanted... but that's what this forum is about, right?
_________________
Muad'zin wrote:
I want Pterodactyl sounds dammit, not a nice little analog sustain.